Date: April 27, 2026 To, The District Collector & District Magistrate,Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. Subject: Seeking urgent intervention, mandatory preventive measures, […]
Date : 20-04-2026 ToThe Director General of Police,Uttar Pradesh. Dear Sir, Sub: Arbitrary police actions against workers and their supporters
09-04-2026 To,Shri A. Revanth Reddy,Hon’ble Chief Minister, Government of Telangana. (Through Shri V. Sheshadri, IAS, Principal Secretary to Chief Minister)
Our Main Concerns
1. We were kept in the dark about dangerous chemicals
During public consultations, the company never told us about GX902, a chemical they now say they will use. We only learned about it after the Ministry asked for additional details. This chemical was never mentioned in the original application we were shown.
When we asked questions about PFOA (a banned toxic chemical), the company said they would not use it. But they did not tell us they would use other similar chemicals that are equally dangerous. This feels like we were deliberately misled.
It is the HRF’s considered view that the instant case must be registered as two crimes, that is under Section 109 and Section 103 of the BNS respectively in the Rampachodavaram police station under which jurisdiction the crime has been committed. The first is a crime of Attempt to Murder by the now deceased and the other a crime of Culpable Homicide Amounting to Murder by the police purportedly in self-defence. Therefore, the concerned police personnel have to be put on trial. The burden of establishing a preponderance of probabilities in favour of the exception relating to self-defence to a competent court rests upon the police personnel who have fired causing death. Importantly, the case must be investigated by an agency completely independent of the State police.
We submit that the proposed project does not deserve environmental clearance for a number of reasons which we will elucidate below. HRF believes that there are serious social, environmental and health hazards that the proposed project entails. The EIA report is without scientific merit. The process is detrimental to livelihoods and will cause irreversible changes in the ecology of the area.
To,The Chairperson and Members,Expert Appraisal Committee (Industrial Projects 3),Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEF&CC),Indira Paryavaran Bhawan, Jor Bagh
To,The Chairperson,National Human Rights Commission (NHRC)Manav Adhikar Bhawan,Block-C, GPO Complex, INA,New Delhi – 110023 Subject: Complaint regarding non-handing over the
16.05.2025, Hyderabad. To, Justice Shameem Akhter,Chairperson, Telangana State Human Rights CommissionHyderabad Sir, The Human Rights Forum (HRF) extends warm wishes to
12.05.2024. To,Sri P. Ranjit BashaThe Collector,Kurnool District. Subject: Representation for Revision of Draft Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for TGV SRAACL,